Subject:
|
Re: Family values?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:42:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
365 times
|
| |
|
|
I meant he wouldn't be much of a victim to be forced to pay child support due to
his previous action. I thought that was obvious.
I KNOW *I* don't have any children in the world, and never will.
Christopher Weeks wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > He's not much of a victim - it was HIS choice to take the risk of causing a
> > pregnancy (even IF birth control methods were used) - no sympathy from me
> there.
>
> So you wouldn't feel victimized if you found out that you had a ten year old
> son that had been kept from you? I would.
>
> Chris
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Family values?
|
| (...) there. So you wouldn't feel victimized if you found out that you had a ten year old son that had been kept from you? I would. Chris (23 years ago, 7-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
