Subject:
|
Re: demographics - Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:09:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
871 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> The above is taken from:
> http://www.findarticles.com/m1061/2_110/65014590/p1/article.jhtml
Good cite.
Did you just use that for a demographic factoid, or do you agree with the
conclusions the author draws?
By the way, do you think this author's factoids are sufficiently vetted? Do
you accept all of them, or just the ones that agree with your preferences?
The reason I ask these questions (1) will be obvious to any critical thinker
who reads the cite all the way through.
1 - and the implications with respect to your arguments.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: demographics - Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) Assume you do not dispute the points I made which you snipped? (...) What do you think? Read the message header. Read the text I quoted. Read my argument. Draw your own conculsions. Key phrase of note: "they (guns) are most likely to belong to (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | demographics - Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) There is no need, I found them: =+= OWNERSHIP OF guns is extraordinarily widespread in the United States, and has been for some time. Indeed, since the late 1950's, when surveys on this question were first done, the share of American (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
