Subject:
|
Re: Christian morality (cont)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:41:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
568 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> But my point remains. Arguing against certain behaviours on the grounds that
> they are not allowed by the church (which is what Steve is doing) requires a
> great deal of backstory to be proven before there is any hope of justifying
> imposition of restrictions on those that don't voluntarily subscribe to
> christian mores.
And applies equally for aethiests too, as I'm sure you meant to say. As for
the backstory, see "Plowed ground".
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Christian morality (cont)
|
| (...) Oh ya. And I see you just posted a good thought starter about where morality comes from, etc. I don't speak for all atheists. I don't speak for all libertarians. (technically I'm not even atheist, actually... I'm atheist leaning agnostic) But (...) (24 years ago, 16-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Christian morality (cont)
|
| (...) Fair enough. But my point remains. Arguing against certain behaviours on the grounds that they are not allowed by the church (which is what Steve is doing) requires a great deal of backstory to be proven before there is any hope of justifying (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
