To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8186
8185  |  8187
Subject: 
Re: Christian morality (cont)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:39:52 GMT
Viewed: 
401 times
  
Steve Thomas wrote in message ...
a question we could ask is, Can someone consent
to something that is by definition immoral?

Certainly. The recipient of a bribe, for example.

However, there's a possible landmine in your question: define "by definition
immoral" :-)

If not, then in principle it
would be impossible to give informed consent to any behavior that violates
the principles behind marriage.

Which principles, yours or theirs or ???

Kevin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Christian morality (cont)
 
Mr. Powell, Thanks for your feedback. You responded to part of what I had said as follows: (...) No, I'm not saying that at all in the sense in which you are using the term "marriage". I was not thinking of marriage in the legal sense, but in the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

34 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR