To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6313
6312  |  6314
Subject: 
Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:11:28 GMT
Viewed: 
806 times
  
"Bruce Schlickbernd" <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote in message
news:Fz59Mr.LAn@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes:

Well, then I feel that this issue as it applies to STAR WARS figs is NOT • a
race issue.  It is an issue of being accurate to the movie, like TLC has
done with its previous products (in portraying people, not spaceships). • But
as soon as its steps beyond that, at least by two attitudes portrayed • here
(Damien and Bruce), it becomes political.

You forgot to include yourself.  I have connected my comments to the • movie, and
its implications in respect to the entire Lego line, as have you.  You are
attempting to dismiss others viewpoints as "political" (and I only use the • term
because that is what you have used) while denying that yours aren't really • any
different.

Fine.  My views are political too, but I feel that politically, I'm taking
the safe side.  And I don't feel that this (Lugnet) is the place to
challenge this notion - we can all see how it is detrimental to the
community and not fostering goodwill and constructive play.

Enough said.

Bruce has some good points, BTW, and I respect him for them.  I don't • agree
with his claim that everything is political, however (reading back, I
believe that was him who said that.  Correct me if I'm wrong).  But he • can
get his point across effectively, and that's a good thing.

Go back and actually respond to my post.  All I'm saying is that no matter • what
decision Lego makes, it is political by your definition of political.  I'm • just
using your term -  I actually don't see what politics has to do with it
all.

If I wasn't mistaken, you were telling me what to do there.  Could you
possibly imagine I didn't reply to that post because I didn't think it worth
my time?  Or, that I had addressed the issues that were worthwile in other
replies?  Damien isn't the only person who thinks he's talking to a brick
wall....
--

Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com

http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance

ICQ: 23951114
AIM: TimCourtne



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
 
(...) In your opinion. Perhaps you are right that it is the safe side, but I don't particularly view that as a good thing. (...) Where else would one challenge Lego's policy but here? You started this particular thread in any case. (...) As in, if (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
 
(...) You forgot to include yourself. I have connected my comments to the movie, and its implications in respect to the entire Lego line, as have you. You are attempting to dismiss others viewpoints as "political" (and I only use the term because (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

37 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR