Subject:
|
Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 07:55:24 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@/StopSpam/mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
440 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote:
> I accept the force-initiation test as an argument for whether something is
> good, not whether it is a potential right. I don't think we've gotten to the
> point (in our discussion here; not necessarily in general *grin*) where we
> can distiguish between the two yet.
For clarification -- I do assert that all the rights in my initial list pass
the force-initiation test [1] (as Larry asked that they do) in the absence
of at least one separate and additional property right.
[1] although not necessarily any other test which may exist for "goodness"
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
