Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 08:41:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
714 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> Richard Franks wrote in message ...
> > Maybe.. AFAIK Libertarian policy on education is to remove the burden of
> > school taxes from those not responsible for the education of children. This
> > would leave the education system with substantially less income, to
> > supplement this,there does seem to be plans for some form of social
> > contract:
>
> Oh, I suspect the school system will end up getting just as much money. If
> nothing else, corporations will spend the money so that they can get trained
> workers (which is where the bulk of the money should come from anywise,
> though a prudent parent will spend extra money to guarantee her child the
> extra edge). The money corporations will give is definitely not altruism,
> they are giving it because they need the workers [...]
And after I go to the Company School, I can shop at the Company Store.
Maybe it's my cynicism rearing its ugly head again, but I just don't buy into
the kieretsu paradigm. I don't think a corporation, especially one as
accountable (to the shareholders) as would exist in a Libertarian system, would
willingly fund education when they get no *direct* benefit from it. Why should
I sponsor n diplomas if all those bright young minds might work for my
competition?
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
