To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3453
3452  |  3454
Subject: 
Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 07:17:02 GMT
Viewed: 
473 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
If you are itching, why don't YOU sketch out a try at it, you know how I
think. Here are a few tidbits...

what does it mean to manipulate matter?
what does it mean to create something?
if an animal is amoral, can it have property?
if things are required for survival, how does one obtain them by reason,
as reason is the tool we have?

<nitpick> reason is ONE of the tools we have </nitpick>

I may take a stab at this too, but like you I have no idea when.  The coming
weeks are going to be busy, with war coming up.

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: ("life affirming" == "no initiation of force") == "all rigihts are property rights"?
 
(...) That's fine, but I am going to try to show that life-affirming REQUIRES property rights because of the nature of man. That is, to not recognise them is to be anti life affirming, or in other words if you want to be human, you have to recognise (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

29 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR