Subject:
|
Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:56:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1178 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
But I do
know that it’s true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that
were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and
your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and
morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down.
|
| |
So, for this, the headline reads, “Abort all black babies and cut crime, says
Republican”. That is a complete distortion designed to smear and mislead.
It’s simply outrageous, if not outright libel.
JOHN
|
Boiled down, Bennett did indeed say “Abort all black babies and cut crime.” You
can slap qualifiers on it such as he said it might be morally reprehensible, but
I think his very statement was pretty morally reprehensible regardless on a
rather large number of levels.
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Here's (URL) the audio> And the transcript: CALLER: I noticed the national media, you know, they talk a lot about the loss of revenue, or the inability of the government to fund Social Security, and I was curious, and I've read articles in (...) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
