To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27332
27331  |  27333
Subject: 
Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:32:54 GMT
Viewed: 
1284 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In any case, he is certainly not advocating in any way, shape, or form what the headline read. You must acknowledge that.

The headline doesn’t suggest one way or the other that Bennett is advocating anything. It is reporting what he said, then goes on to chronicle the incident itself and the reaction to it. Giving abbreviated but accurate headlines is what the purpose of a headline is.

Would you have preferred “Republican radio talk show host used questionable-yet-accurate rhetorical device while in debate with caller concerning race, abortion, crime, and economics”?

   And the smear works like a charm. For instead of debating the sleezeball journalism practiced by the Guardian (which was the topic of my post), we are talking about Bennett, and whether he’s a racist, and when was the last time he beat his wife.

I disagree. I had no real idea what your initial post was about. You raised an issue but didn’t provide enough of a topic to guide the discussion where you wanted it to go. The topic was Bennett’s racist comment, so that’s where the discussion went.

However, I disagree that the Guardian is doing anything out of the ordinary. If the headline is what is bothering you, then the fairly straight forward and complete news-story below should have made you feel better. I didn’t see anything in story that seemed overly biased, and certainly nothing that was libelous.

-Lenny



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
 
(...) Really? "Abort all black babies and cut crime, says Republican". That doesn't come off as a proposal? Please. (...) Therein lies the rub-- "accurate". (...) That's my whole point, Lenny! It is a non-story. The "story" comes as a result of the (...) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
 
(...) The whole "race issue" is a throwaway. I think what statistic Bennnett is picking up on is that the crime rate is disproportionately greater among black people (which is fact). So if you hypothetically aborted all black babies, then yeah, (...) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

31 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR