To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27328
27327  |  27329
Subject: 
Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:29:17 GMT
Viewed: 
1202 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Avery Christy wrote:
   Am I correct in seeing another fallacy here, not necessarily one on Bennett’s behalf, but more of one in general?

That being that it is instead economics that drives or motivates crime, not race as Freakonomics seems to put forth

Freakonomics puts forth the idea that most crime is caused by the poverty-stricken segment of society (excluding massive corporate fraud, which is pervasive and carried out by the wealthiest segment) and further postulates that most of the abortions that have occurred since Roe v. Wade have prevented additional births within that poverty-stricken segment. The argument, then, is that the decreased crime rate correlates with the increased rate of abortion among the poverty-stricken, which is to say that additional (ie., non-aborted) births may have fomented the crime rate among the poverty-stricken.

Freakonomics makes no claim, as far as I’m aware, regarding the race of those in poverty. That addendum is entirely Bennett’s.

Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
 
(...) The whole "race issue" is a throwaway. I think what statistic Bennnett is picking up on is that the crime rate is disproportionately greater among black people (which is fact). So if you hypothetically aborted all black babies, then yeah, (...) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
 
(...) Am I correct in seeing another fallacy here, not necessarily one on Bennett's behalf, but more of one in general? That being that it is instead economics that drives or motivates crime, not race as Freakonomics seems to put forth and that then (...) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

31 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR