To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27369
27368  |  27370
Subject: 
Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 8 Oct 2005 05:41:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1472 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:

   Hey, something just occurred to me. With your above statement in mind, would you say that it is appropriate or inappropriate to have a citizen’s private extramarital affair dragged through the media for months on end?

Appropriate? Don’t know if I use that word. Listen, most of the news churned out by the media is pure pulp. Think Hollywood. I couldn’t care less about a star’s private life; in fact, the less I know about it, the better for them, because I tend to associate negatively with “stars” who use their 15 minutes of fame to espouse their agendas.

Heston should keep his mouth shut, then?

  
But is it inevitable? Oh yeah. As long as someone cares about that stuff (and there will always be those who do) there will be the papparazzi right there to serve it up for them.

As for politicians’ private lives.... if they have committed a crime then I see no reason to hide their shame. Perhaps a little more shame and conscience in the first place might have avoided the incident in question.

$40,000,000 to discover a non-crime seems a bit excessive. Other than such a criminal waste of money, I must admit I’m with you in saying I couldn’t care less (the only time I care is when some holier than thou hypocrite lectures me about “family values” that don’t apply to himself).

  
Is it the job of the media to seek out those stories? I don’t think so. But if a wife of an adulturous senator goes to the media and wants the world to know what a sleeze he is, who is to stop her? We make our beds, and we must lie in them;-)

So, if Bennett pops off about the criminal rate going down if the black population is reduced, and doesn’t challenge the validity of the statement, then he should lie in the bed he just made?

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
 
(...) Appropriate? Don't know if I use that word. Listen, most of the news churned out by the media is pure pulp. Think Hollywood. I couldn't care less about a star's private life; in fact, the less I know about it, the better for them, because I (...) (19 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

31 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR