Subject:
|
Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 18:24:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1038 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Case closed
Nevermind that Bennett is pro-life. What a smear. And even the Bush
administration runs for cover from political hack fallout. Brutal.
JOHN
|
Apart from the slightly sensationalistic title I don’t see how this article is a
smear at all. It is quite factual and clearly states that he qualified his
statement. If you disagree with his anti-choice politics not being spelt out in
the article I would assume that they were implied by his political standpoint
and books.
As for use as toilet paper, while The Guardian is far from my favourite
newspaper, I would suggest that the radio station which aired the initial
comments might be more worthy of that status (metaphorically of course).
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
