Subject:
|
Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:49:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1313 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
| |
We can discuss the
problems with the Guardian article and Bennett’s problems
simultaneously, for that matter.
|
I don’t have any interest in discussing any individual’s personal problems--
suffice it to say that we all have them.
|
Hey, something just occurred to me. With your above statement in mind, would
you say that it is appropriate or inappropriate to have a citizen’s private
extramarital affair dragged through the media for months on end?
Just curious...
As opposed to “Just Curios,” a store specializing in knicknacks and nothing
but knicknacks.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Appropriate? Don't know if I use that word. Listen, most of the news churned out by the media is pure pulp. Think Hollywood. I couldn't care less about a star's private life; in fact, the less I know about it, the better for them, because I (...) (19 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Fair enough. But the link to crime and being black (in Bennett's mind) is merely from drawing on statistics. Blacks do account for a disproportionate amount of crime in our country, regardless of reason (which is a different discussion). (...) (...) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
