Subject:
|
Re: How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 23:50:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1111 times
|
| |
| |
Christopher Weeks <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message
news:37C6AA90.8AAC200C@eclipse.net...
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> >
> > Your perogative, but it may or may not be the opinion of others. Or are
> > you arguing that the endings were lower quality because they had lower
> > production values? Nope...
>
> They were lower quality because decent art shows a piece of the
> creator's heart and when an artist changes that for mass appeal, it is
> more sterile. In the case of the two movies sited, I have no particular
> knowledge to support or refute the claim that those were the original
> endings, but I think I like them better too.
Here's the million dollar qustion: how can the general public be competent
enough to be an adequate judge of movie quality (or of political
decision-making) but not of whether or not there is a God?
Jesse
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|