To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1749
1748  |  1750
Subject: 
Re: How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 03:33:15 GMT
Reply-To: 
cjc@newsguy*saynotospam*.com
Viewed: 
926 times
  
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
Art that cannot find a buyer is valueless, **by definition**, because
the value of a thing is exactly what a willing buyer will give up to
possess it. If no one wants it, it has no value.

I apply the "in my living room" rule to art.  If I'd be proud to have
it displayed in my living room it's valuable art.  If not, it may
still be art, just not in my living room.

Lots of the junk you find on college campuses, in fact most of it,
falls into the "not in my living room" category.

--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/   (still in Beta)



Message is in Reply To:
  How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism
 
(...) I'll grant that they may well have changed the endings. But what of it? Who is to say that the ending they chose is "lower quality"? How do you define quality in this context? George Lucas is free to choose to organize his films however he (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

49 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR