To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1762
1761  |  1763
Subject: 
Re: How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 21:41:08 GMT
Viewed: 
972 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, "Jesse Long" <jesse.r.long@gte.net> writes:
[...]
Lucas needs to spend less time pandereing to the audience and
weaving racist stereotypes into his films and spend more time being a good
filmmaker.
[...]

Why does Lucas *need* to do that?  (Or anything else for that matter?)

Isn't what you really meant to say instead:  that you personally would be
happier with Lucas's movies if he spent less time pandering to the audience
and weaving racist stereotypes into his films and spent more time being what
you personally consider to be a good filmmaker?

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: How to decide what art is worth (was Re: Extropianism
 
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:37BF2A50.B6DC18...ger.net... (...) Quality takes time and effort. You can't just throw something together and have it be quality, unless you're some kind of genius. In films, quality can be (...) (25 years ago, 22-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

49 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR