To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18634
18633  |  18635
Subject: 
Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:29:44 GMT
Viewed: 
550 times
  
I think if we bring it right back to the beginning of this particular
thread, Larry posted many good ideas and ways for us to agree to disagree
and move on.  Let us all, then, in the spirit of gentlemen, move on from
this particular issue to other things.

Let us also hold in our minds, the points that Larry listed as to what makes
a 'good debater'.  We may not necessarily agree on every specific 'jot and
tittle' (can I say 'tittle' in this group?) , but it is a good place to start.

So to begin again with ot-d, in 'boxing'ese, let's keep it clean, and no
punches below the belt, and see how far we get.

Clean slate--start afresh, and lets move on to other things to debate,
should we wish to debate, and keep in mind what makes a good
discussion--clarity, sincereness, and the ability to consider other people's
POV.

If we 'agree to disagree', then move on from a polarized issue, I think
we'll be doing a good service for all participants involved.

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
 
(...) I'm sorry, Dave, but how can there be a clean slate when Scott is dirtying it faster than it can be cleaned? Your current discussion with Scott simply illustrates all of his usual tricks: decrying personal comments while getting in as many as (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
 
I'm probably making a big mistake in responding, but... (...) Ok, I dug out the post I believe you are referring to. In that particular exchange, you were choosing to jump on a single point of mine (as you do to everyone) and tearing me down for it. (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

38 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR