Subject:
|
Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:51:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
507 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
<snip>
> What is amusing is that I had just sent David a private message telling him
> the pattern of Scott's debating "style" and the exchange just preceeding
> your message was the proof of it. It's like pulling teeth. You have to go
> round and round in circles trying to pin him down (note David's careful
> reconstruction of the discussion). Scott's ego-defense mechanism is to say
> "I didn't say that" and provide neither supporting evidence or further
> illumination. When asked for further illumination he says he already has
> been illuminating (then why the heck are they asking?). And round you go
> again. Scott would be surprised at how many times I would agree with him,
> but for that I just don't want to be associated with him in any way, shape,
> or form.
>
> I applaud David's mature approach, but Scott is only showing the futility of
> such. The only and best option is to stop feeding Scott's need for
> validation. Don't respond to his messages.
>
> -->Bruce<--
D'oh! I forget sometimes that my e-mail program for my home account has to
be started manually when I'm at work. So I didn't get Bruce's message until
now.
So there you are.
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
38 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
