Subject:
|
Re: The skinny on Jenin, the European Press
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 May 2002 16:39:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
457 times
|
| |
|
|
> > If, on the other hand, you've been fighting over and ove and over again, for
> > multi-generational injustices on both sides, and there is really nothing
> > left to do that would *end* *the* *killing!!!!* besides relocating (or
> > dropping a nuclear weapon in the center of town, thus eliminating *both*
> > parties, and therefore the conflict altogether) then for the love of all
> > things rational, take the relocation.
>
> Well, sure--I agree that relocation is preferable to ongoing mass murder,
> even if that relocation is inconvenient or undesirable to me.
If a family has lived on the same plot of land for generations, why should
they be removed (relocated) without compensation to provide a home for an
economic migrant from the former USSR who has chosen relocation to improve
his own personal well-being?
Why do people choose to relocate to the occupied territories knowing the
suffering it causes? Because the land was gifted by God?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The skinny on Jenin, the European Press
|
| (...) This is the part that messes me up, though; aren't there quite a few people now living in that region who were personally subject to relocation? If so, then they would seem to have a legitimate grievance. (...) Well, sure--I agree that (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
