Subject:
|
Re: The skinny on Jenin, the European Press
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 May 2002 00:22:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
377 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> They were damned if they did, and damned if they didn't.
Speaking of damned if they did, damned if they didn't... (and otherwise only
VERY LIGHTLY linked to this thread if at all)
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/columnists/orl-edpparker22052202may22.column
It so happens that I do not quite support the theory that KP is advancing
(that we need to line up docilely for the scurrilous loss of freedom in the
name of security, and other changes, and blindly support the Prez) but her
column does present a rather interesting thought experiment, doesn't it?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The skinny on Jenin, the European Press
|
| (...) Only if you say so, Lar. "The scurrilous loss of freedom in the name of security, and other changes, and blindly support(ing) the Prez" would almost be worth it IF we were getting real value for those changes. That's a HUGE if, and it just (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The skinny on Jenin, the European Press
|
| (...) Correct:-) You know Chris, they don't call the right "right" for nothing;-) (...) Which leads to the question, why do "studies" at all? Seems to me that their purpose is to influence popular opinion by their results and advance agendas, (...) (22 years ago, 25-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
