To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15022
15021  |  15023
Subject: 
Re: The *real* Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 08:41:13 GMT
Viewed: 
326 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Grubber writes:
Hi all,
I have been observing recent events in the world, and i just have to say, • the
governments in some of the major western powers (UK, Canada, and especially • the
US)have lost their marbles completely.  Most other parts of Europe seem to • have
their heads screwed on straight and are not going power-mad.


Although our plight is not as bad as elsewhere, I'm certainty not happy with
the legislation we are rushing through right now. A few hours is being spent
setting aside laws which have worked well for >500 years. By Xmas the UK
will have laws which I thought were reprehensible elsewhere:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=14333

Thankfully, the legislation will have a time limit set on it - it will
expire when the limit is reached. However, I think the 5 year limit is far
too long. In the current climate, I could have lived with one year or 6
months.

And who will be in government when the time limit arrives? What's the chances
they'll vote to extend it?

Good questions. What is good about a time limit is that it will quickly
remove "knee jerk" legislation. It will also should force bad legislation to
be re-debated & perhaps modified/repealed.


The irony is that only those immigrants who would suffer persecution if
returned home will be imprisoned without trial here... what is the sense in
that!

Our government passed an equally stupid bill regarding asylum seekers recently
(with the help of the opposition, who'd be complaining about it now if they
weren't licking their electoral wounds!).


Talking of your government, I heard that you have a 100% chance of having a
republican PM next time around? Should the UK expect your flag and banknotes
to change?

Scott A
(Who is still miffed the Queen did not open your Olympics :) )



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Republic? (was: The *real* Phantom Menace ...)
 
(...) recently (...) You shouldn't listen to rumours! Anyone who predicts 100% chance in anything political is talking through the wrong end of their digestive tract. It's likely (IMO) we may become a republic in the next 20 years. I'm not prepared (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The *real* Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
 
(...) the (...) the (...) have (...) months. And who will be in government when the time limit arrives? What's the chances they'll vote to extend it? (...) Our government passed an equally stupid bill regarding asylum seekers recently (with the help (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

27 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR