To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14333
14332  |  14334
Subject: 
"unconstitutional detention" (Re: So now it's official...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:35:40 GMT
Viewed: 
210 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/26/national/26CONG.html

Glad I'm not an immigrant in the US:

"For example, it denied the administration the power to detain indefinitely and
without charges immigrants suspected of involvement in terrorism. The bill does
expand the limit to seven days of detention, from two days, though under some
circumstances that could be repeatedly extended by six-month periods."

  This is only new in that it can be used to detain people
  who have otherwise legitimate papers.  If you're found to be
  somehow suspect or in violation of your visa, you already
  *can* and often *are* detained without trial indefinitely,
  in conditions that have been roundly condemned by human-rights
  organizations around the world.


Indeed, I read about the case of Dr Mazen Al-Najjar who was held for over 3
years ( May 1997 - December 2000) without charge based on "secret evidence".
He had lived in the USA since 1981. His lawyer said this when he was
released (from BBC):
"We are absolutely ecstatic Janet Reno has come to her senses and stopped
this unconstitutional detention"

Has anyone been detained longer than him without charge in the USA?

Has their nephew also been ejected from the Whitehouse:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1414000/1414900.stm

Scott A





  I have a feeling these facilities are about to be "expanded."
  However, what about the countries of origin of those detainees?
  Are we to expect acquiescence on all cases?

  LFB



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: "unconstitutional detention" (Re: So now it's official...)
 
(...) Before anyone gets hot and bothered about rights in the UK, this is an AI overview of detention without trial due to risk of terrorism in the UK: ==+== The maximum period of detention without charge is seven days, with an extension of up to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: So now it's official...
 
(...) This is only new in that it can be used to detain people who have otherwise legitimate papers. If you're found to be somehow suspect or in violation of your visa, you already *can* and often *are* detained without trial indefinitely, in (...) (23 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR