Debate : 15003


Off-Topic / Debate / 15003	15002 \| 15004

Subject:	*Re: The real* Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic**
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:51:13 GMT
Viewed:	304 times

"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> writes: > That aside, your point is an interesting one. Most of the new > legislation allows for situations where there is insufficient > evidence for a clear conviction. I assume that Norwegian courts > would not extradite without sound evidence anyway? I suppose no sane courts would extradite without sound evidence. But even with sound evidence, it is a violation of basic principles of right to extradite suspects to a country in which they may face an "improper" justice. The recent events appears to put the US on this list of countries. (I say "appears" because no such cases have arised around here yet. But the matters have been discussed in the media.) Fredrik

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The real Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
(...) There is a lot of talk in our media too. Most of it about foreign nationals living here planning acts in 3rd countries. They all seem top overlook the possibility that UK nationals may wish to plant bombs also... Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The real Phantom Menace and the fall of the republic
(...) I think EU countries do not extradite where there is a chance of a death penalty anyway? ...perhaps OBL should come live in the EU? That aside, your point is an interesting one. Most of the new legislation allows for situations where there is (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

27 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search