To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12489
12488  |  12490
Subject: 
Re: UK devolved government. (was Re: Harry Potter getting left out)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:57:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1076 times
  
In lugnet.loc.uk, Simon Bennett writes:
As you may know I work for Ken Livingstone indirectly, in Transport for
London, so I can answer these two questions (the Underground one perhaps in
more detail than you may need!)

   No, actually, that's probably not as much detail as I could
   withstand.  :D  I read pretty closely on the matter when I was
   living in Hornsey and in Acton, especially after Kiley got
   involved because I use Boston's and New York's systems quite
   often and I'm always impressed by how comparatively well they
   run (though the cars are usually pretty dirty compared to LU's).

1 - Sunday trading:  The Mayor and London Assembly don't have the power to
alter the law as they cannot introduce anything which overrules
Parliamentary legislation.  Legally this is because the GLA is established
under an Act and is therefore subordinate to Parliament in any area in which
it has not been given specific devolved powers.  Practically this is because
the UK is one of the most centralised democracies there is.  I think this is
a bad thing and it rankles that such a good multi-tiered system was devised
by people who were culturally British and then only implemented where they
lived and not over here!   I'd love to discuss this a little as I have read
a great book by Johnathan Freedland of the Guardian newspaper called 'Bring
Home the Revolution' which advocates us moving to a system like the US'.
When I lived in California I was amazed to discover the whole system of
Propositions and Measures.  That sounded like real democracy to me.

   Much in the same way that a rat looks like food to a starving
   person, or the way that to someone who's never seen a movie,
   Steve Gutenberg looks like an actor?  ;)

   One of the nicest things about the US system is a real set of
   checks and balances.  IIRC, there are many many MANY cases where
   the Supreme Court of the US has overruled state or Federal
   authorities for overstepping their bounds in forcing their will
   on matters that should rightly be reserved to the people of a
   municipality or other smaller division.  The UK doesn't have
   a real history of struggle between local, state, and federal,
   so it doesn't surprise me that the decrees go from the center
   outward more often than the other way.

   But in short, our democracy is still messed up, we've just found
   other ways to befoul it.

2.  PPP: As you may have read Bob and Ken's court case was thrown out.  PPP
is still on track ('scuse the pun).  This revolves around the same issue.
We argued that PPP would prevent us from having management control of London
Underground (LUL) and this would put Ken in conflict with his duty under the
GLA Act.  The judge ruled, and I don't think anyone who understands our
system surprised, that Government can tell him exactly what he can do.  This
was a small (tiny) victory for Ken and Bob as we can now say 'not our fault,
we said this would happen' if LUL continues to underperform and 'look how
we've sorted it out' if PPP works.

   I've noticed that ol' Red Ken is quite good at putting his
   opponents in an unenviable position of choosing to be damned
   by public opinion or to concede.  Not bad, really, given how
   thankless a position he's got.  The Press was falling a bit
   out of love with him when I left, given the LU strikes and so
   forth (maybe he's not Red enough anymore?).

One last light at the end of the tunnel (there I go again!) is that last
year John Prescott said the PPP would need to pass a 'public sector
comparator' test to ensure it was value for money.  TfL have recently won a
case to force London Transport (which still exists as the Board for LUL) to
publish a report by Parsons Brinckerhoff that Bob commissioned during his
brief time as LT Chairman prior to the election.  This report says the PPP
is clearly not good value.

   Everyone's said that.  Virtually every commentator I have seen,
   British or not, has stated that privatization of systems crucial
   to the functioning of the state--in effect, the reversal of the
   Attlee centralization and beyond--will spell disaster in terms
   of reliability if not finance (although the evidence for both is
   pretty good).  One only need look at Railtrack's dismal record
   of maintenance and response; it took *how* many days to get things
   up and running after last fall's weather fiasco?  Britrail always
   had enough people to do the job quickly, rather than compete with
   other, richer firms for limited private-sector resources.

I hold little hope though and since I work in TfL Rail Services and we are
going to have to sort this sorry mess out eventually I am extremely
irritated by the Government's intransigence.

   As is everyone.  I'm especially irritated with John Prescott, who
   comes across as a real buffoon (although some have said that he's
   the fall guy for Blair and Gordon Brown and too dim to realize it).

   Then again, NS in the Netherlands is the center of controversy too,
   and they're nice and centralized.

   But anyways, you're preaching to the choir.  I had to laugh when
   ES published a piece about how they should hire Giuliani to run
   London.  Oh, that would make Labour REAL happy.  :D

   best

   LFB



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: UK devolved government. (was Re: Harry Potter getting left out)
 
(...) You need to read a bit more widely, perhaps. And does the fact that "everyone says so" make something actually "so" ?? (...) In what way is Railtrack an example of privatization? There's still one company controlling *all* the track that is (...) (23 years ago, 9-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: UK devolved government. (was Re: Harry Potter getting left out)
 
"Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:GJF0zu.LB6@lugnet.com... (...) I would have thought the UK has plenty of history of struggle between local, state and federal over the centuries. We've had civil wars, and the formation (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  UK devolved government. (was Re: Harry Potter getting left out)
 
(...) Lindsay As you may know I work for Ken Livingstone indirectly, in Transport for London, so I can answer these two questions (the Underground one perhaps in more detail than you may need!) 1 - Sunday trading: The Mayor and London Assembly don't (...) (23 years ago, 9-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

42 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR