To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.mediawatchOpen lugnet.mediawatch in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 MediaWatch / 848
847  |  849
Subject: 
Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:03:29 GMT
Viewed: 
1305 times
  
In lugnet.mediawatch, Felix Greco writes:
I would encourage people disgusted by Fionnula Bourke's article to email
their grievance at:
icFeedback@mrn.co.uk
I agree completely, I'm no authority but I would suppose that what's in the
BT is no more so that in the Bible. That reference was ment to discredit
that person in question and the BT was used to paint a futher despicable
picture on the back of Brendon's efforts. I found it very distasteful. Any
reader can obviously see that the two issues were unrelated. It was sad that
the writer had to use what ever they could drudge up to make that person
look worse. What that person did was bad enough on its own without having to
contribe further.

Besides, wasn't the BT mentioned on several BBC television programs in a
positive light?

e



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
 
I would also add that a review of the 20 Questions article on BimP would shed a whole "lotta" light on the Reverend's view of the bible and it's message. Sheesh...don't journalist do their research anymore? This is simply nuts. Steven (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
  Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
 
(...) That's the point exactly. Brendan has been scrupulous not to manufacture anything that you can't find right there in the verses he cites for each image. Like Kyle said... is this person anti Bible? (...) I would agree with the sentiment, Eric, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
 
I would encourage people disgusted by Fionnula Bourke's article to email their grievance at: icFeedback@mrn.co.uk my response: In your article "Councillor in child porn probe" Dec 29 2002, by Fionnula Bourke, you report the Brick Testament as a site (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)

31 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR