To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.mediawatchOpen lugnet.mediawatch in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 MediaWatch / 846
845  |  847
Subject: 
Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:34:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1252 times
  
In lugnet.mediawatch, Kyle Beatty writes:

Your reporter evidently did not have time to actually visit all the
"questionable internet sites" mentioned in the article or she would have
discovered that the "twisted biblical tales" in the Brick Testament are only
as twisted as their source material. The Bible.

How true. It always amuses me at how our society "shuns" those parts of the
Bible that aren't all holy and pure. Guess what people? You have to deal with
the bad AND the good because the original writers are trying to TELL you
something important! And in the case of this "jornalist", all I can say is that
her and her editor should be run out of the business for allowing such an
obvious POS to be printed. It makes the National Inquirer read like the New
York Times. Yeesh!

-alex



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
 
(...) stronger bastions of respectable journalism in the UK. In any case, I sent the following letter to the editor. It's couched in the usual over-assertive letter-to-the-editor style that seems the only way to get past the sub-editors. to: (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)  

31 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR