To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / *2600 (-40)
  Re: (Brad Justus? Please respond)Re: Why aren't we going crazy?!?
 
(...) Well Aaron, I am in the UK and was just as excited as you, so I went to my local Lego retailer and they confirmed that they were aware of some special sets that are scheduled for release later this year. Although they did not have images the (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  (Brad Justus? Please respond)Re: Why aren't we going crazy?!?
 
(...) Is LEGO really reissuing old sets? Can we expect an official answer? I can only assume that all information circulating is true as we should have heard from one of the LEGO representatives that seem to read and respond SO frequently here on (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Old sets being sold in new guise?
 
I know some German, I'll try to improve the translation here a bit. (...) Now you have the unique chance on 1000steine.de to preorder! (...) The sets from previous years are being reissued with fresh new designs (meaning the packages). (...) (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
 
  Set Reissures...are these for real?
 
Can any LEGO Direct people here confirm anything about these set reissues? Are they the real thing? If so, is it a global thing and is it something LEGO will be doing continually, or just these five? Thanks! (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Old sets being sold in new guise?
 
That's right -- Michael - - - Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk Lugnet Member# 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lego Magazines from the Past and Present www.lugmag.com or www.lugmag.co.uk Home of (...) (23 years ago, 20-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Old sets being sold in new guise?
 
(...) "obligatory without obligation" seemed a dead giveaway to me. :-) ++Lar (23 years ago, 20-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Old sets being sold in new guise?
 
That's a babelfish translation, right? :-) -- Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde "Michael Edwards" <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:GDLu5p.ECu@lugnet.com... (...) purchase (...) - (...) - (...) it (...) set (...) I (...) popular. (...) missed (...) (23 years ago, 20-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Old sets being sold in new guise?
 
"The 8459 being release as 8464" can LD confirm this? This is what it said LEGO® Classics the TOP articles for LEGO® fan NOW use the unique chance on 1000steine.de for collective order! That are again presented the absolute racers of the letzen (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bionicle Web Site Contest Tools Redux
 
One more thought: Though the contest is limited to four physical web pages, what would the ruling be on content delivered via framesets? Can I post one to four pages, but stuff extra info (but not more actual pages) into the site without being (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Bionicle Web Site Contest Tools Redux
 
So...it's been a while now...has anyone received their Bionicle web site contest pack yet? I haven't, and the stuff hasn't been posted yet to the site. LEGO Bionicle team: If you see this, can you give us a new update on the availability of the (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: LEGO Systems Announces New Chief as President
 
Bryan, I will gladly give the details, but right now I don't have the time, so stay tuned... Gary Istok (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
Richard, I couldn't have stated it any better than you in the way you lament our lack of basic building parts. You waxed poetically at the historic lack of parts available to the fans of their products. Ironically TLCs own set designers are also (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Creator set found
 
(...) I got it at KB for $25, and KB sells stuff for higher than MSRP as well, so $20 could be the real MSRP. (...) No idea, its pretty dumb. All it has is a cheap piece of cardboard to cover it. :\ Jeff (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
 
  Re: Creator set found
 
Thanks, that has to be the one because I remember that it had a mail box. I think it is also the largest creator set. I wonder why Shopko is selling this set for $19.99 (reg), they usually charge retail or higher. Now I have to ask, why isn't there (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
 
  Re: Promo set, why can't we have one made?
 
(...) Agreed. TLC has a soft spot for the UN, I think. They let the UN do the refugee posters using minifig images, and they hardly ever let ANYONE use minifig images, even other charities. (not completely. but hardly ever) So they may well have (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) Well as I looked for this I found two places mentioning 'system' or 'system of play'. First was page twelve where it is mentioned that GKC came up with 'system of play' in or around 1954. Second mention is on page seventeen, KKK was mentioned (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Promo set, why can't we have one made?
 
<snip> (...) <snip> NO LEGO LUGNET promo set PLEASE!! I agree 100%. Direct and bulk with wide availability is the direction I would rather see as they are infinitely more "core" to the LEGO product and goal of the toy. The gold is in the bricks and (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Promo set, why can't we have one made?
 
(...) Even if that were the case, I'm pretty sure that that was some sort of exception, not the rule. (...) Exactly. Townies want vehicles, Castleheads want knights, Pirate fans want soldiers, etc etc. I wouldn't buy any of it. I just don't see the (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Promo set, why can't we have one made?
 
Ah, but things have changed lately... BTW, the UN set supposedly only had 3000 made, right?... The new Bulk Sculptures are in plain B&W boxes... The pumpkin only had instructions online... So I would think that it would be relatively simple for LD (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I think it was GKC rather than KKK that came up with the idea of a "system of play." And I think it was part of the vision for LEGO way before the early '80s. Maybe even the '60s? I think I recall that from "The World of LEGO Toys." Just the (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  LEGO Mania magazine: questions and comments
 
I go the latest LEGO Mania magazine in the mail today. I have a few questions and comments about the magazine. I have always assumed that LEGO S@H produces this magazine. Is this true? Is someone at LEGO Direct responsible for the magazine's (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)  
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I don't have my copy of that book in front of me to confirm but this squares 100% with my memory of what it said as well. "system" is a great idea, incompletely realised as of yet... ++Lar (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) You're right, Larry! And you know how I hate it when that happens... =oP I had a co-worker, who shall remain nameless, who possesses this kind of short attention span. We had gone to TRU together a few times -- and while I always made for the (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I am going from memory here, so bear with me (I will check my memory later against the source I am referring to). Earlier I had mentioned a book entitled "The Ultimate Lego Book" which was published by DK apparently with TLC's full cooperation (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I hope this discussion DOES continue, you guys have found a promising new line of analysis, I think! Jeff's description of a vicious circle in product development (moving more and more in the Jr direction as the effects of previous jrization (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I agree, and I had a sneaking feeling that if we compared notes we would find much congruence between our theories. Getting back to the topic of pirates, if, as you noted, Pirates sold so well at its introduction, and if, as I surmised, it (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I am willing to give the "sheer madness" argument more credence than yourself. But I'll allow that your reasoning could be sound up to a point. But I tend to think that TLC is quite out of touch with what consumers really want and what they (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Ball n' socket packs?
 
Or "aye", according to personal preference... (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I'd rather not, thank you, this not being the lugnet.off-topic.deb...n-sequitor group. (...) Do me a favor and address me for the posts I make, and not for the posts that others may or may not have made in the past. I've been gone awhile, and (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) As quasi-rants tend to be...deal! (...) OMG, this same "tired" argument every time! We already know they are taking a bath on these kinds of sets, or at least the retailers are -- go check out the RR stuff on sale at TRU right now. How do I (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I think it is quite pertinent, although at this point it might be more useful to ask why TLC is not producing NEW sets that supplement existing or previously popular themes. (I admit I AM biased in that I like the idea of having some pieces (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Ball n' socket packs?
 
Third this for me! All in favor say "I". -- Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. "Bryce McGlone" <bmcglone@ditim.com> wrote in message news:GDCB15.6Hq@lugnet.com... (...) parts (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) That's a nice slip into quasi-rant mode, but it's rather nonsequitor. Regardless, yes, I might wonder if bricks and minifigures are "tired" (in terms of buyer interest) since LEGO continues to juniorize their product (ie pitch them at younger (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) <snip> (...) Eh? You mean "tired" like bricks? "Tired" like minifigures? "Tired" like accessory parts. "Tired" like just about anything that doesn't immediately gratify or amuse one and requires active user participation and creativity...?! (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) There's nothing contradictory about that. What may have been a bestselling line in 1989 may have been losing container-shiploads by the mid-nineties. And this might have happened even if the design of the sets hadn't gotten progressively (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) I do consider Playmobil to be a major competitor of LEGO's, in terms of idea space if not in terms of marketshare, and there certainly is a lot of similarity between certain Playmobil themes and LEGO themes. I think the "borrowing" may go both (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Re: New 'Club Shop' magazine contains Accessory Packs and more
 
"Lawrence Wilkes" <lawrence@thewilkesf...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GDC3z5.CqA@lugnet.com... (...) I meant 'has been going mad about'. (obviously, I have gone made too) PS I forget to add it came inside the packaging for some parts I ordered (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.castle, lugnet.pirates)
 
  Re: Ball n' socket packs?
 
I'd like to second this request. (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  Ball n' socket packs?
 
I think it would be great if S@H sold the new technic ball and socket parts that are included with Technic Stormtrooper and C3P0. Maybe 4 balls and 4 sockets in a pack or something? See what you guys can do. :^) Thanks! ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 
  New 'Club Shop' magazine contains Accessory Packs and more
 
Just received a new 'Club Shop' magazine - not seen this before - marked May/June 2001. - it's not a full shop at home catalogue - just an update I guess. Interestingly it contains several of the accessory packs that everone has been going made. (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.castle, lugnet.pirates)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 40 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR