Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Nov 1998 18:31:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1927 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> It's LEGO. There's only so much that can be done in the way of
> scale-modeling realism. If they wanted to make an accurate scale
> model, they'd have to make a bunch of specialized new structural
> pieces. Which is what most of us were afraid would happen. "New for
> 1999: Star Wars LEGO! Just put these 5 pieces together, and you're
> ready to play!"
>
> I'd rather have slightly clunky-looking models than non-LEGO models.
> I'm *very* happy with what they've done.
>
> Steve
Copletely agree, till the end. I always like the "logo look" ogf the models, and
like imagining very much how soft this curves are indeed, of this studs and
corners...:-) (to see what I mean, look at my older models at LeoCAD Model
Gallery page, especially look at the ship hulls, and aircraft fuselages/wings)
By the way, starwars sets are the ones that I dreaming to see, from structural
point of view. They are much more "lego" then what I had believed that they
would be some sort of SW Jr. rubbish. (I fall in love with the Y-wing with the
first look..:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
| (...) It's LEGO. There's only so much that can be done in the way of scale-modeling realism. If they wanted to make an accurate scale model, they'd have to make a bunch of specialized new structural pieces. Which is what most of us were afraid would (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
