Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sun, 1 Nov 1998 17:10:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.%StopSpam%org
|
Viewed:
|
2086 times
|
| |
|
|
"Selçuk <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> wrote:
> By the way, in the old X-wing computer game, the Y-wings were quite
> reliable againist both TIE bombers and TIE fighters. I love them especially
> in escort missions, bacause of their high survivability which was allowing
> me to concentrate on the TIE's rather than my own shield/armor. But, it
> should be admitted that dog figthing againist TIE interceptors with them
> was real pain in the ass..:-)
Yeah that's why the A wing was my favorite -- once you get good at flying
it, nobody's fast enough to touch you.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
| (...) In the old game, they were my favorite too, for a gemeral purpose craft, especially when the striking side was the rebels. I remember destroying more than 60 T/F T/B T/I assortment and 5 blockade runners at a time w/o any wingmen while the (...) (26 years ago, 1-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
| I'm sure that at least one could return . In the scene in which deathstar blown-up at the back ground, at least one Y-wing was accompanying to the several (2 or 3) X-wings. By the way, in the old X-wing computer game, the Y-wings were quite reliable (...) (26 years ago, 1-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
