Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Nov 1998 16:22:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4190 times
|
| |
|
|
I'll second the stubby look. The fuselage looks a little short. As for lumpy,
what do you expect? LEGOs traditionally have lumpy studs on top. :-)
Duane
Matthew Miller writes:
> Greg Williams <gregw@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > I like the X-wing design. I think it is quite well done. I can see it will
> > need some modification for retractable landing gear, though. So does the
> > Y-wing. I think the Y-wing is the best design of the ships they show. I like
>
> Maybe my hopes were too high. Compare to
> http://www.starwars.com/vehicles/x-wing/1_bg.html for example -- the Lego
> design is way too stubby and lumpy compared to the long, sleek "real"
> X-wing.
>
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
> Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
| [followups set to lugnet.starwars] (...) That is a GREAT shot! It's funny, though, that they chose a shot of an X-Wing in closed-wing configuration -- it's not even an "X" in that shot. :) (...) Well hey, the neat thing is that the fuselage can be (...) (28 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
| (...) Maybe my hopes were too high. Compare to (URL) for example -- the Lego design is way too stubby and lumpy compared to the long, sleek "real" X-wing. (28 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
