Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 31 Oct 1998 16:33:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@NOSPAMmattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
2564 times
|
| |
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> I take the view that the pieces are probably quite versatile. Lots of
> pieces seem to have some kind of ball joint coupling, which is kinda
> scarce in Technic at the moment. I'll be crossing fingers! :-)
Someone on RTL suggested that these are ZNAP, not real lego at all. I've not
seen ZNAP, or even good pictures of ZNAP, so I can't tell. Thoughts?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
| (...) I agree. Before I saw the "Technic" label on these pictures, I thought they looked like the Znap pictures I have seen as well. Sarah Heacock (27 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
| (...) I take the view that the pieces are probably quite versatile. Lots of pieces seem to have some kind of ball joint coupling, which is kinda scarce in Technic at the moment. I'll be crossing fingers! :-) Fredrik (27 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
