To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 50249
50248  |  50250
Subject: 
Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Original-Followup-To: 

Date: 
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:33:02 GMT
Viewed: 
1091 times
  
Willy Tschager wrote:

that somebody might feel offended by my language

I wasn't the least offended. In fact, I thought it was a misspelling of
something (which I didn't try to decode) when I read the post.

BUT I strongly reject the procedure!
[snip]
In an ironic way someone could ague that the "way" it is done on
lugnet is indeed in no way a cencorship; it's much more
sophisticated: it's the art of auto-critics in a wonderfull
george-orwell-style - get me brainwashed!

I agree with you. There's no difference between admins cancelling and admins
threatening action if the post isn't cancelled. It just looks better on the
scoreboard.

As far as I remember, I've never reacted on the language in a post from you.
OTOH, posts from LP have gotten me to heat up several times, not because of
'foul language' but because of the offending tone.

I find it very hypocritical (of lugnet admins) to attack *words* and ignore
*meaning*.

I do not wish to be associated with a community which hasn't the bravery
to admit that
censorship is applied.

But there isn't any censorship! Censorship attacks your *views*, the lugnet
ToU just forbid certain combinations of letters. No-one would have noticed
it if you had used Swedish for that one word that got the roller steaming.

Looking only at parts of the words you wrote, the post is obviously a break
of the Terms of Use. The same may be said about this quote from an English
song: "Cock-a-doodle-doo".

The admins could certainly take a softer, more user friendly view, adapted
to the importance of the break, and if you are a first-time offender.

It's time to say goodbye :'-(

I think that's a premature decision. Maybe you should take some days off
from lugnet to let your anger calm down a bit (I understand you completely),
and then come back and continue the important discussions about LDRAW etc.

Best wishes from a guy who has deleted hundreds of posts before pressing
'send', just to try to stay inside the ToU.

[This is the self-censored version, The 'real' version of this post was
twice the size, and contained at least five ToU breaks]
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD:  http://w1.161.telia.com/~u16122508/proglego.htm
Gallery:   http://w1.161.telia.com/~u16122508/gallery/index.htm



Message is in Reply To:
  (murfl)
 
(murfl) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.org.it.itlug, lugnet.general) !! 

29 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR