To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 50241
50240  |  50242
Subject: 
Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Original-Followup-To: 

Date: 
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:12:40 GMT
Viewed: 
1348 times
  
In lugnet.general, Mark Jordan wrote:
In lugnet.general, Orion Pobursky wrote:
The above is why I explicitly object to the draconian enforcement of language
standards.  These words are *NOT* bad but simply words.  Their use to convey
thoughts, ideas, feelings and emotions is the same as any other word in the
English language.  If the argument is that these word are typically viewed as
inaappropriate then I contend the *any* word can be used in an inappropriate
manner and what is inappropriate for some may not be inappropriate for others.

This is true, but there are some words that many people find offensive and/or
don't want their kids to see.

But I don't think the issue here is about naughty words.

I think the issue here is with the Orwellian mode of enforcement. I'd prefer to
see a black and white list of offensive words which aren't acceptable on Lugnet.
That way people can easily avoid these ugly situations.

By what standard do you create this list?  See this post for reference:
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=12104

-Orion



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) I'd prefer to (...) This is exactly why Lugnet has not published a list of no-no words. But really, is there anyone here who doesn't know that f**k is a bad word? I think the only two words that would get you an email from an admin are f**k (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) This is true, but there are some words that many people find offensive and/or don't want their kids to see. But I don't think the issue here is about naughty words. I think the issue here is with the Orwellian mode of enforcement. I'd prefer (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)  

29 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR