| |
In lugnet.general, David Koudys wrote:
<some good stuff that I can't quote without getting censored>
To me the suggestion that the current policy in not censorship is ridiculous.
It's like the bully that grabs your arm and make you hit yourself, then claims
he wasn't hitting you. It obviously he's hitting you, and it's obvious that
lugnet is censoring through similar bully tactics.
Why lie about it. Just say you are censoring, and get on with it. I've felt
more anger from people since this policy was introduced then I've felt over any
other issue.
If lugnet censors fine. Lots of media censors and I know that it censors and I
know how it censors. I can judge its content appropriately knowing that. With
lugnet all I know right now is it's trying to hide behind false claims. How do
I judge that?
Well frankly it's giving me a very low opinion of everyone associated with
running this site.
I'm not going to stop posting here because of censorship. In fact I might even
appreciate it. There are lots of places I can go to read uncensored materials,
and write whatever I want without being censored. I don't need lugnet to be one
of those places.
I do however need lugnet to stop lying about it.
Censorship or no censorship, it is fine with me. Just don't claim one and
practice the other.
Derek
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
