| |
> > The model that we use is that we do not cancel things because "we don't like
> > them" or even because "they are violations". Rather, the model is that the
> > user must ask for a cancel. Not say to us, "cancel if you want" but
> > explicitly asks for a cancel, because that way we are not exercising
> > editorial control. That is the way that things are done on LUGNET.
I would like to point out:
> "that way we are not exercising editorial control"
Isn't that an editorial control??? This is a paradox!
I agree with the fact that Lugnet should remain a pleasant place to talk but as
far as today I don't agree with the way how this is done.
It is the same as a killer would force his victim to kill himself just because
he don't want exercising control on other people's lives...
Luca
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
