| |
David Koudys wrote:
> I was thinking about the 'various ways' that people could get around the
> built-in filter (if there was one).
>
> Then I started thinking that if the filter turns specific words into #%##$, and
> people know that, so they type S P A C E D words to get around the filter, then
> that person *knows* they're in violation of the TOU and had to work consiously
> and specifically to get around it, therefore appropriate measures would be used.
A well crafted set of regular expressions would make this simple evasion
harder to do.
> So do we have different language filters for different regions, or do we just go
> to the lowest common denominator and add words that would be offensive in any
> part of the world to the database?
IMHO regional filters would be difficult to do effectively. You'd need
to know what region the reader is in as well as the region the poster
was from : (
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) I was thinking about the 'various ways' that people could get around the built-in filter (if there was one). Then I started thinking that if the filter turns specific words into #%##$, and people know that, so they type S P A C E D words to (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
