| |
In lugnet.general, Jeff Johnston writes:
> Go check the lugnet.com main page. It specifically states that
> the gift is not believed to be a sponsorship or endorsement "in
> a legal sense". [...]
BTW, I just changed that passage from "...which is not believed to
constitute sponsorship or endorsement..." to "...which does not imply
sponsorship or endorsement..." (i.e., to remove the "not believed to"
portion). When two top LEGO Systems, Inc. attorneys have said in no
uncertain terms that BradJ's donation does not imply sponsorship or
endorsement of LUGNET, that is about as certain as it gets.
--Todd
[xfut -> .admin.general]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
| (...) Go check the lugnet.com main page. It specifically states that the gift is not believed to be a sponsorship or endorsement "in a legal sense". The normal definitions of the words do not matter here - the legal definitions under US law (since (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
