Subject:
|
Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Dec 1998 07:13:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.#spamcake#IWANTNOSPAM.com
|
Viewed:
|
1365 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Jacquot wrote:
> I believe that the SIG members will collectively be sufficiently
> knowledgeable to make such a decision. They all will have at least
> an interest in their field, and might possibly have some additional
> qualifications (yet to be determined), and will have the benefit
> of each others expertise. This isn't the way crafts guilds usually
> work, and it may not be what Larry had in mind (haven't heard from
> him lately), but I think that it would work.
You're carrying on just fine.
If this nascent idea cannot be implemented except as a popularity
contest, I would oppose it. NMRA models are judged without names
attached, and many of the MM criteria the NMRA put in place are at least
partly based on how some set of models you did fared in competition.
Further, it's not whether your model won the competition that counts,
it's how many points it scored. If you scored 80 and won, doesn't count.
If you scored 88 and came in last, you're all set (the threshold is 87.5
in a lot of cases).
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
| Matthew Verdier wrote: r (...) For what it's worth, this is pretty much exactly what I had in mind (still not speaking for Larry). (...) I agree absolutely with respect to the merit awards. With respect to the service award, I can't say that (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
