 | | A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Dylan Reardon
|
| | | I was looking at the Castle World website - catching up, if you will - and I came up with an idea, which isn't at all refined; just an idea... Possible Problem(s): One could assume that with all the stories, worlds, realms, dungeons, waterfalls, (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Pawel Nazarewicz
|
| | | | | (...) Craig and I were talking about this a long time ago, and we figured out that every Realm will have its own set of rules. If Craig wants wizards to fly in his Realm, and I don't in mine, when his wizards enter my realm and I don't want them to (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Doug Dropeskey
|
| | | | I'm just musing around here, having not read everything for castle world, so pardon me if I make some obvious error... As Pawel states in his reply, each domain belongs to a particular person who may exercise complete control over that domain. From (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Pawel Nazarewicz
|
| | | | (...) Musing is fun:) (...) Agreed ... (...) We gave this some thought, and this is what we came up with this grid system: X O X C X O X P X F X O X S X C - Craig's Realm P - Pawel's Realm F - Frank's Realm S - Shiri's Realm X - Neutral Zone The (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Franklin W. Cain
|
| | | | | (...) "Frank"?... Are you possibly referring to Frank Filz?... ;-) Franklin (that's _eight_ letters, and _two_ syllables!) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Pawel Nazarewicz
|
| | | | | | (...) At the time of me writing this, I had an e-mail correspondence with Frank Filz, so yeah :) (...) Don't worry - we know:) -- Pawel (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Most definitely - no one can decide for you... (...) Yeah... and then (more musings, using the same notation, with O as unclaimed realms), if for example you have (a bit more complex arrangement): X1 C X2 O C X3 C X4 X5 C X6 S O X7 S X8 So (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —John Carroll
|
| | | | | (...) [snip] Hello, I was wondering how do you travel between realms? is CW a planet that has tons of contenents with each realm on part of a contennt, where chars can walk or ride or swim or travel by boat to the other realms? What if Each realm (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Nathan McDowell
|
| | | | | | | (...) Castle World is one world with many realms/domains/kingdoms. It's a shared world with no real central force or rules(for magic or disputes). It was pretty much made to facilitate the telling of stories. When you join Castle World, you are just (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate. —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | | | (...) Or Stargate... But a really nifty idea i think. I think thats an incredibly logical idea on how to solve the discrepencies between realms. I've been working on a story for my site this evening, and I was thinking how nifty it would be to bring (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Doug Dropeskey
|
| | | | Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G1GvFy.10s@lugnet.com... (...) who (...) is (...) system: (...) go (...) unclaimed (...) It does, but your answer leads me to lots more questions. :) Does CW have any hard and fast rules? From (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) I really gotta go to school, but I'll try to be brief ;-) (...) No. (...) Yep. (...) Not entirely. The rules are mainly to have fun, and then there's the golden rule of Creativity, Cooperation and ... something... I always forget the last C. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Rick Kurtzuba
|
| | | | (...) My question is, why must Castle World have any set map? If I want to have a lake, a mountain, and a forest in my realm, am I going to be prevented from doing so because my particular grid squares don't contain those environments? It seems to (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Dear, dear, no, no way! *You* decide what goes in your part of the "map". Look, I don't know it all, nor do I presure to. The map issues are not entirely resolved. What I know comes from little tidbits of info Craigo has told me. And I know (...) (24 years ago, 30-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Rick Kurtzuba
|
| | | | (...) See, that's what I thought. In fact, I kind of took that for granted until I heard some of the talk about the map, which made me wonder. (I'm coming to this kind of late.) Anyway, the folks running Castle World have made it pretty clear that (...) (24 years ago, 30-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Ken Dowd
|
| | | | (...) CW is a wonderful idea but the map seems to raise an awful lot of issues. It seems to me that a "Magic: the Gathering" approach would be easier to implement and cause less confusion. The Magic card game is built around many worlds (planes) (...) (24 years ago, 30-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) While "separate worlds" reduces the friction, it also reduces the interraction. There is a lot of benefit to having strong interrations between peoples creations. The important thing is to allow each participant to work with the other (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Matt Brooks
|
| | | | (...) Being a long-time Magic afficionado, this is the most appealing aspect of realm placement to me. It's not very confusing, unless you want it to be, nor is it too terribly difficult to understand. This also allows (to address a subsequent point (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Rick Kurtzuba
|
| | | | | (...) Ah! Yes! This is exactly what I think Castle World should do, too! (Although I'm hardly an isolationist; I sure hope that's not the impression I gave. I want to interact with other balladeers as much as anybody!) It seems to me that this way, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Anthony Sava
|
| | | | | (...) issues. (...) Not to be a stick in the mud, but here's another thing to take into account. I've always considered my realm to be set in the past relative to all the others. After all, there are things that have/will happen in my realm that if (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Ken Dowd
|
| | | | | In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Matt Brooks writes: <<Matt's idea on realm placement snipped>> (...) I agree. There are people who like the idea of the map and the interactivity that it provides. There are also people who would prefer creating their own (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | <big big snip> Wow! That's what I get for sitting in the lurch for a while and lurking, huh? ;-) I gotta say some great ideas about Castle World were raised here, both in this post, the replies to it, and the one it replied to. I honestly don't know (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Pawel Nazarewicz
|
| | | | (...) A little history here: In the beginning, Castle World was simply a surrogate for the fact that all of us live so far apart and can't combine our creations and make a single awesome community. I was meant to be a virual community and place for (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CW Questions (Was: A thought about some CW issues that may emanate.) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) page: (...) Oh, I remember it all right... and then there was the page with the left-hand frame, before the one with the top one... huh... that sure was a long time ago! (...) <smile> true, true. It would be *so* nice to be able to have, say, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| | | | |
