| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky wrote:
>
> > The bottom line is that I feel that the authentication emails
> > are an undo burden placed upon the system so that a relative minority can
> > continue to use NNTP.
>
> The authentication emails have NOTHING whatsoever to do with NNTP. A properly
> configured NNTP server uses usernames and passwords for authentication. (And
> lazy b******s circumvent the authentication emails with an intelligent
> autoreplier.)
>
> So yes, Lugnet doesn't work optimally, but why don't we try to fix the small
> bugs in Lugnet, instead of switching to a much worse system? Or is there a
> clearly spelled out policy from the Lugnet administrators, which declares that
> nothing can be changed?
People have been asking for change for years with no visible effort being put
into this. I'm tired of waiting. Maybe you can try?
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Forum shift
|
| (...) The authentication emails have NOTHING whatsoever to do with NNTP. A properly configured NNTP server uses usernames and passwords for authentication. (And lazy b******s circumvent the authentication emails with an intelligent autoreplier.) So (...) (16 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
