| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> The bottom line is that I feel that the authentication emails
> are an undo burden placed upon the system so that a relative minority can
> continue to use NNTP.
The authentication emails have NOTHING whatsoever to do with NNTP. A properly
configured NNTP server uses usernames and passwords for authentication. (And
lazy b******s circumvent the authentication emails with an intelligent
autoreplier.)
So yes, Lugnet doesn't work optimally, but why don't we try to fix the small
bugs in Lugnet, instead of switching to a much worse system? Or is there a
clearly spelled out policy from the Lugnet administrators, which declares that
nothing can be changed?
Play well,
Jacob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Forum shift
|
| (...) People have been asking for change for years with no visible effort being put into this. I'm tired of waiting. Maybe you can try? -Orion (14 years ago, 2-Nov-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Forum shift
|
| (...) Except that, for most, the web interface is the way they use LUGNET. In addition, I use a separate email client and newsreader so I'm sure there are others like me. The bottom line is that I feel that the authentication emails are an undo (...) (14 years ago, 31-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
