To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / *1676 (-40)
  MOTM and SOTM voting on hold
 
Just to let everyone know... The Model/Scene of the Month competition is on "hold" for a short time. We have to get the scripts and html to all work together again with the new site structure. And we couldn't really do anything until the site went (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  RE: Font too small for Mac
 
TWS Garrison (...) Agreed...logical markup allows people without a new browser or everything turned off to interpret the site correctly, even if it isn't pretty. CSS still allows you to modify the way the headers and such display, even if it doesn't (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
 
  RE: Font too small for Mac
 
(...) like the smallest font size is 8 pt. Perhaps Tim should change the fonts to be declared in relative font sizes instead of absolute point sizes. Tim: use TD { font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica; font-size: 0.9em; font-weight: normal; } (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: The LDraw Community is what each person makes it
 
(...) I've put together a tutorial. It is the first in a series on how I put my LDRAW POVRAY animations together. I'm looking for feedback and mistakes. It's at (URL) if you think it is worthy, feel free to link to it or repost it. (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Font too small for Mac
 
(...) Out of curiousity, I tried this on my Mac (iMac 333, MacOS 8.6 - yes, I am a ludite). I got the same 'too small' with MSIE 4.5, but got a good font display (I assume the issue is the radio buttons on the right) using Netscape 4.76. Ray (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Font too small for Mac
 
(...) different sizes? Of course, I can't see that, because *everything* has fonts that look too small in Solaris/Netscape, so I require all basic text to be displayed at what Netscape calls 24pt (more like 14pt). HTML is designed for that kind of (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
 
(...) Okay. I don't think these fall into the categories of known bugs you mentioned. . . On this page: (URL) talks about downloading unofficial parts one-by-one, but only provides a link to download them all at once. This link is broken. Following (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Font too small for Mac
 
"James Reynolds" <james.e.reynolds@m.....utah.edu> wrote in message news:GqAtyy.7IL@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) way, the fonts can stay the same on the PC (where they are perfect size). I wish the browsers/fonts didn't display differently between (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Font too small for Mac
 
The fonts on (URL) are too small for the mac. Here is what the main page looks like on a Mac for both Netscape and Explorer: (URL) Reynolds (URL) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  DOH! An additional thanks (How could I forget??).
 
(...) DOH DOH DOH DOH DOH!! How could I POSSIBLY forget Terry Keller! My most sincere apologies. Terry has worked diligently for over a year (unsure of the exact duration, probably closer to two years) on the Model of the Month and new Scene of the (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
 
  Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
 
There are a few sections on the new LDraw.org website which are not fully operational yet. Please make a note. Model of the Month/Scene of the Month Voting (URL) script which runs this section has not been made fully operational on the new site. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  More Announcements - a Tutorial, some About Us documents, and more
 
Hello again! I'm writing a second post to point out a few specifics. First off, the awaited Animation tutorial by Ahui Herrera. (URL) I have written a couple of documents in the About Us section of the site which I feel are of importance. Most (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Announcing All New LDraw.org Website!
 
Greetings!! I am very pleased to present to you our totally new and redesigned website at: (URL) past several months at LDraw.org have been spent putting together this new site with a focus on ease of navigation, straightforward information, and (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish) !! 
 
  Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
 
(...) I was pretty well convinced, but I went and checked all the Ice Planet sets (1993 sets, the year that 6116 would have been introduced, and the year that Flourescent Orange intro'ed). 6116 would have (does) make a very convincing element code (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: 973p30.dat, "Minifig Torso - Pirate/Bare-Chested/Vest/Tattoo"
 
Steve, I didn't see this part in the Parts Tracker at LDraw.org, so I sent you another copy of this DAT file and the two subfiles. Please let me know when you receive them. Thanks, Franklin (23 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: x475.dat, "Minifig Hat Tri-Corner"
 
Steve, Why isn't this part listed in LDraw.org's Parts Tracker? I know I sent this file to you some time ago. Thanks, Franklin (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  [parts tracker] search by AUTHOR
 
Steve, I've got a request for the parts tracker ("(URL) It would help me if I could search the list by Author, to see the status of all the parts that I've posted, instead of having to wade through the entire list of parts (and hope that I've (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: "Round"
 
(...) Steve, I really, really, *REALLY* want these two put into the category "Container", 'cuz that's exactly what they are. :-/ Thanks, Franklin (23 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Some problems with parts in ML-CAD
 
(...) After you download COMPLETE.EXE, did you execute it? If you executed it, did you execute it in the right location (usually from C:\>, not C:\LDRAW> )? Did you search your hard drive for 6219.dat? If you ran COMPLETE.EXE, but in the wrong (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Some problems with parts in ML-CAD
 
"Rene Virsik" <virsik@sco.svf.stuba.sk> wrote in message news:Gq3y37.5w4@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) plate" (...) parts (...) The only shuttle part I can find in lcad9802 is "Wing 16 x 14 Shuttle (needs work)" which is part 6219. In the current (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Some problems with parts in ML-CAD
 
(...) Did you run MKLIST.EXE (it's in the LDRAW-directory)? Jeroen (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Some problems with parts in ML-CAD
 
I scaned it more times. No new parts. I don't know where ALL the missing parts are. It seems that I have only the base parts database... ;( Rene (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Some problems with parts in ML-CAD
 
File: Scan parts. Gary Rene Virsik <virsik@sco.svf.stuba.sk> wrote in message news:Gq3y37.5w4@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) plate" (...) parts (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Some problems with parts in ML-CAD
 
Hi, I've downloaded the complet parts database from Ldraw.org but in my ML-CAD I can't see many parts from updates. For example I can't find "shuttle plate" from lcad98-02 update. I downloaded this update but it seems that this parts ARE YET (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: The LDraw Community is what each person makes it
 
Robin Sayce-Jones wrote... (...) That's what I call an understatement! (...) Aint that true... /Lars (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: LDraw.org MOTM & SOTM submissions
 
I have like crappy scene. It's really nothing. Nothing useful. You want it? -Mike (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  LDraw.org MOTM & SOTM submissions
 
Um Hello.... Anybody out there? It's getting close to the cut-off date for submissions to the Model Of The Month and Scene Of The Month. (23rd of each month) I need entries. Please. I currently have 3 model entries and zip, zero, nada for scene (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) ! 
 
  Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
 
(...) nod, I understand. (...) Yep, that's a possibility. (...) That's what I'm wondering. Steve (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) [snip] (...) Do you have the *right* numbers for these elements? Steve (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) Hmm. I think a parts database, that tracks multiple (hopefully, *all*) names for each part, would be a very good thing. Steve (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) "...fellow in most every respect, although _my opinion differs very strongly with his_" would be my preference. SURELY you don't see this as objective subject matter? (...) I'm pointing out the argument from the majority position here. I've (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) Not what I meant. James had the number wrong. That's not the number for that element. (...) I've never seen an element numbered 2881, James had that one wrong too. But that's my name for that element. It's served me well for the 8+ years I've (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
 
(...) No, sorry - the bulk of this research was from (a lot of) miscellanous parts in my spares box, and I cannot be sure of the providence of many of my made up sets, so any info from them would be near worthless. (...) Unless problems with the use (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
 
(...) I guess it does! I've got some comments below, but for now, let's stick with the two documented part numbers. If someone wants to create these non-functional variations of the part(s), I'm ok with that. But let's not get into xxxxA, xxxxB, (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
 
(...) A brief investigation of my spares reveals a more complex situation. There are variations in three regions of this part 1) The ribs between the inner cylinder and the rim: 1A) no ribs 1B) small rectangular ribs 1C) larger triangular (rocket (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) Nope, the number is right. Larry (and you?) misunderstood what part I was using as an example. But, the URL is wrong. The right URL is: (URL). (...) Is this your name for 2881, the official name for 2881, or something you made up on the spot? (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) "We're in agreement. My bone is with Joshua, an extremely clever fellow in (...) Better? :-) (...) Fix or discard those that don't. Standards evolve and packages need to evolve too. (...) This is a terrible idea. Get the names right instead (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  New style of part file
 
I've posted three new files on the Parts Tracker, they are at: (3 URLs) These files are all 'shortcuts' - they don't have any code, except a reference to another part file. The reason I submitted these files is because these three parts are all (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) Wrong number, BTW. (...) "Double Curved Handle, Bottom Hinge, 3M", FWIW (...) ad hominem, Lar. Tsk, tsk. It's a subtle version, though. Props for that. (...) Doesn't work in every package. Of course, it doesn't concern me QUITE as much, since (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) I forgot to mention, please take a look at these Parts Tracker entries: (2 URLs) :) (...) Do you have any links to these discussions? Steve (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 40 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR