To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1644
1643  |  1645
Subject: 
Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 22:38:32 GMT
Viewed: 
3469 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Chris Dee writes:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> > > I've posted three new files on the Parts Tracker, they are at:
> > > 
> > > In the case of 6143/3941, there is a slight-but-noticeable variation
> > > between the two related parts.  So the 6143 shortcut file could
> > > eventually be replace by an actual part, modelling the variation.
> > > 
> > > Steve
> > 
> > A brief investigation of my spares reveals a more complex situation.
> 
> I guess it does!
> 
> I've got some comments below, but for now, let's stick with the two
> documented part numbers.  If someone wants to create these non-functional
> variations of the part(s), I'm ok with that.  But let's not get into xxxxA,
> xxxxB, etc., until we have to.
> 
> You don't happen to have estimates of the years for any of these changes, do
> you?

No, sorry - the bulk of this research was from (a lot of) miscellanous parts in
my spares box, and I cannot be sure of the providence of many of my made up
sets, so any info from them would be near worthless.
> 
> > The probable sequence of these changes with the colours I can confirm is
> > 
> > 3941 (and other older un-numbered versions) : 1A 2A 3A : (suggest 3941a)
> > - Blue Yellow Black White Grey
> > 
> > Change to include small rib
> > 3941 (number part visible under rib)        : 1B 2A 3A : (suggest 3941b)
> > - Red Blue Yellow Black White ClrYellow
> 
> So much for the opaque/clear theory - unless using different molds for
> opaque & clear is an approach TLC developed over time.

Unless problems with the use of this mould for the (earlier) ClrYellow prompted
a new mould for the (later) ClrFluorOrange, ClrFluorGreen, Clear.
> 
> > Change to include larger rib - possibly important for trans parts
> > ???? (number not visible on my parts)       : 1C 2A 3A : (suggest 3941c)
> > - ClrFluorOrange ClrFluorGreen Clear
> 
> Interesting - I'm looking at one of these (from an Exploriens 6938 Scorpion
> Detector), the only number is '61 16' (the 2 pairs of digits are separated
> by an under-stud hollow).

Strange, that's rather high for the presumed mould-well numbers, usually like 1
06. Perhaps this varient really has got a different official number?
> 
> > Change to gripping extensions
> > 3941 (number not visible on all parts)      : 1C 2B 3A : (suggest 3941d)
> > - Red Yellow Black White Grey Brown
> 
> Hmm.  Is the number visible on *any* of these parts?

I found it on just one black version - until then I thought the much
more visible gripping extension change had triggered the change from 3941 to
6143.
> 
> > Change to axle hole rib ends
> > 6143 (number not visible on all parts)      : 1C 2B 3B : (suggest 6143)
> > - Red Yellow Black White Brown
> > 
> > So, Steve it looks like your classification includes just 3941d and 6143, but
> > 3941-like varients are definitely not confined to transparent colours. • Strange
> > that the part number change is linked to the smallest of variations - and the
> > two numbers are almost anagrams of each other.
> 
> The anagram thing happens a lot - or at least, it seems to.
> 
> > Chris (now wishing he'd not read this posting !)
> 
> You did an amazing amount of research in a very short time.  Wow!

You just caught me at a good time !
> 
> Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
 
(...) nod, I understand. (...) Yep, that's a possibility. (...) That's what I'm wondering. Steve (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
 
(...) I guess it does! I've got some comments below, but for now, let's stick with the two documented part numbers. If someone wants to create these non-functional variations of the part(s), I'm ok with that. But let's not get into xxxxA, xxxxB, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR