| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Lars C. Hassing writes:
> > > The POV code is (or can be) L3P related.
> > > As an example of that see e.g. Chuck Sommerville's minifig head
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/chucks/Dats/3626bp04.dat
> >
> > Hmm. That's not particularly keen. IMO. Not that I can see any way
> > around it.
>
> Which part of it aren't you keen about? Is it all the extra stuff in
> the dat file? If so, then perhaps this is a good time to dredge up
> my 0 INCLUDE suggestion yet again. ;)
No, I meant the POVRay code referring to L3P-generated objects. By
allowing this code in official part files, we'd be endorsing language
that hasn't been generally discussed and reviewed.
Not that I see any particular problem with the code. The situation just
raises a red flag, IMO.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Inline POV-Ray code?
|
| (...) So it appears as if we agree that L3P-generated objects don't really belong in official LDRAW part files. Once again this brings us back to the 0 INCLUDE suggestion. Imagine that ldraw.org (or someone else) distributes a separate set of part (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Inline POV-Ray code?
|
| (...) Which part of it aren't you keen about? Is it all the extra stuff in the dat file? If so, then perhaps this is a good time to dredge up my 0 INCLUDE suggestion yet again. ;) (URL) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
