Subject:
|
Re: Another stupid part-authoring question (Primo?!?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:43:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1441 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tony Hafner wrote:
> My question is whether I should bother designing the stud like other studs
> or whether I should just make it a subpart that doesn't get stud rendering
> optimizations.
Hmm. I don't have any Primo parts handy, so I've got to throw out a
basic question. Isn't the inside of the Primo stud actually hollow? If
we made a Primo stud that was subject to studline'ing, that would leave
a huge hole in the Primo parts, right?
That would be bad.
So I'd say you should just model the Primo stud as a regular primitive,
using your "simplified approach". Call it babystud.dat or something. :)
> In either case, I'm planning on doing a POV-Ray stud as well. The parts are
> actually easier to do in POV-Ray than they are in LDraw anyway. Would we
> need special support in L3P for this to work with either of the approaches
> mentioned above?
No, it shouldn't need any special support.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Another stupid part-authoring question (Primo?!?)
|
| Okay, I'm probably the only one here who really cares about Duplo parts (with the possible exception of Paul Easter). But I figure that some folks at least will appreciate having these added to the parts library. As part of modeling Duplo, I'm also (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
