To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 6991
6990  |  6992
Subject: 
Re: Another stupid part-authoring question (Primo?!?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 02:21:43 GMT
Viewed: 
384 times
  
Tony,

FWIW, my vote is, anytime a partially spherical or parabolic shape
is above a certain size, I *highly* recommend using the "high-res"
(i.e., "48"-part) primitives.

And don't worry about being "one of the few" who express interest
in a subset of LEGO.  I firmly believe that, if you encode enough parts,
*eventually* this *will* spark interest in that subset from others.  ;-)

Franklin



Message is in Reply To:
  Another stupid part-authoring question (Primo?!?)
 
Okay, I'm probably the only one here who really cares about Duplo parts (with the possible exception of Paul Easter). But I figure that some folks at least will appreciate having these added to the parts library. As part of modeling Duplo, I'm also (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR