 | | Re: Forum shift
|
|
(...) I'll second that! (14 years ago, 28-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Forum shift
|
|
(...) It would be great if fans decided to overhaul all of the lugnet forums to a new format. (The current forum should be saved somewhere as an archive of past fan activity.) The PHPbb forum format seems to be the most widely used type across the (...) (14 years ago, 28-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Forum shift
|
|
(...) NOT if it means as painfully slow as the rest of www.ldraw.org. /Tore (14 years ago, 28-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Forum shift
|
|
(...) If this means that will have a forum attached to www.ldraw.org MOVE, if it means that we move to www.xxxx.com/LdrawForum we'd better stay. The homepage at Lugnet.com features an article dated "5 June 2009" (by the way CAD still features the (...) (14 years ago, 28-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Forum shift
|
|
Though I don't yet agree, I have noticed a serious drop in new involvement. I also must admit my own lack of involvement. LUGNET was once the only place to discuss each LEGO topic, but has not done its part to keep up with modern technology and (...) (14 years ago, 27-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Forum shift
|
|
(...) I can understand the problems with staying with Lugnet, but if we switch, then please pick some software which still allows both NNTP, SMTP and HTTP access. Play well, Jacob (14 years ago, 27-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Forum shift
|
|
Hi all, Well, as much as it pains me to say it, unless Lugnet changes the way it runs the forums (i.e. signup easy and intuitive, no authorization emails), I think we may need to change venues to avoid the potential alienation of new (...) (14 years ago, 27-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
|
(...) It appears that nothing has happened since. How about setting up a wiki page and update the page listing when a hold is appropriate together. w. (14 years ago, 16-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | BrickCon LSculpt presentation
|
|
I have uploaded the slides I presented at BrickCon 2010. The slides go through a complex example which includes two different ways of creating 3D models, combining them together, and building the sculpture. (URL) resolution PDF and Powerpoint are (...) (14 years ago, 9-Oct-10, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.events.nwbrickcon)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing LSculpt 0.5.0
|
|
(...) On a side note, I have to say that this "DAVID laser scanner" sounds incredibly cool to me, so much so that I may need to look into acquiring it. Additionally, just five short years ago a 3-D scanner setup was apparently a near pipe-dream, (...) (14 years ago, 1-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing LSculpt 0.5.0
|
|
(...) Thanks! I had already discovered DAVID through your website. I got a line laser from dealextreme too, but I didn't have much luck using the video on a digital camera instead of a webcam. I'll try more later! Sculptris looks very cool. It looks (...) (14 years ago, 29-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing LSculpt 0.5.0
|
|
(...) Excellent! To the palette of tools you mention on LSculpt webpage, I'd like to add (URL) DAVID laser scanner> to build your own meshes. The free version is perfectly usable (but you'll need Meshlab to assemble the scans in a single mesh). A (...) (14 years ago, 29-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing LSculpt 0.5.0
|
|
Hi Bram, Looks stunning. Downloading now! Now if I could find some more time for LEGO I could actually build the horse I sculpted with the earlier version of LSculpt. (URL) Jaco (14 years ago, 29-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Announcing LSculpt 0.5.0
|
|
(URL) At Bricks by the Bay 2010 in Fremont, CA, I gave a (URL) presentation> on LSculpt, a program I wrote a few years ago to convert 3D models into Lego surfaces. After the presentation, (URL) Remi Gagne> offered to help me create a graphical (...) (14 years ago, 29-Sep-10, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Hmmm, it seems to me that any algorithm that can find the missing Type 5 lines (in order to create the dummy entries) should be able to find *all* of the Type 5 lines. Some missing lines is just a special case of all missing. So just include (...) (14 years ago, 23-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Actually, no. That is indeed a long-term goal, but it is hampered by two things. First of all, it's a lot of work. Secondly, the current algorithm is actually useful to part authors, since it can visually highlight missing conditional lines. (...) (14 years ago, 23-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Sorry for that ;o) But (fortunately) here are very few twisted surfaces in LEGO pieces, so I don't think my tool has created too much havoc... (...) Problem is that at this low level I have almost no information about the intended geometry - I (...) (14 years ago, 22-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) I see. So what you really want to do in LDView is ignore the Type 5 lines (at least for smoothing) and smooth wherever there's no Type 2 edge lines between the triangles (and quads). (...) Did anybody ever did actually fix the parts though? I (...) (14 years ago, 22-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) algorithm. LDView uses Type 5 lines in the LDraw file for smoothing, and considers any two surfaces that have a Type 5 line joining them to be part of a smooth curve. The problem is that two co-planar triangles sitting next to each other (...) (14 years ago, 21-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Isn't this the same problem we ran into with the twisted wedge bricks a while back? Those gave us problematic conditional lines in addition to the ugly zigzag shading artifacts. (URL) thought the solution was to orient the triangles orthogonal (...) (14 years ago, 18-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Note that I consider this behavior to be a bug in LDView, and as such I will fix it when I get a chance. --Travis (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Good question! + reduces file size by 50% + 50% less vertices to adjust when building "by hand" + triangles plays havoc with smooth shading (the helical artefact that can be seen here (URL) disappears when triangles are converted to quads. But (...) (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) I realise this is largely off-topic to the oriinal thread but I've always been curious why the use of quads is encouraged when just about every other format and rendering engine sticks to triangles. So the part author merges triangles into (...) (14 years ago, 16-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
There is one more thing to add to Joshua extensive explanations: coplanar triangle pairs are not assembled into quads. I advocated for that, because it offers the maximum flexibility when splitting into subparts or adjusting vertices position (no (...) (14 years ago, 16-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) The astute parts author will notice a slightly new format to these new files. I thought it might help to describe them. The first line is the official LEGO Group name for the part. These are almost always exclusively in UPPERCASE, so you'll (...) (14 years ago, 15-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
This is great :-) What's the communication channel with the Lego Universe team? How do we know when they're gonna make other parts available and when? Looks like part m30408 is a Stormtrooper helmet. I've been waiting for this one for ages! I also (...) (14 years ago, 11-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) If you want to send me a list of the "mysteries," I can help sort that out or you. -- joshua (14 years ago, 11-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) HMM! I wonder how *that* happened :wink: Thanks to you for your help with that, Philo. -- joshua (14 years ago, 11-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Parts 54655 and 54809 come from a motor used for a couple of City Boat sets. (URL) (14 years ago, 11-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
(...) Sorry, link broken due to FTX, it's (URL) here> (14 years ago, 10-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
New parts chart done: (URL) that some parts I could not find on Peeron - those parts ''might'' have been modeled under an unknown part number. Those parts need investigating. -Santeri (14 years ago, 10-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
Some interesting parts in this submission. cu mikeheide (14 years ago, 10-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
Few really new parts... but some outstanding ones (eg. 30408). And a much improved quality, compared to previous releases! (...) Thanks in advance, Santeri! Philo (14 years ago, 10-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
Awesome news! Love the quantity of Bionicle parts there... (yes I'm back D:) I'll be sure to make the fourth chart to the Wiki. :) -Santeri (14 years ago, 10-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
|
|
Hi folks, the LEGO Universe Team has shared another batch of part shapes with the community, with the purpose to make them fit for the LDraw Parts Tracker. As usual I have uploaded them to my webspace (the upload module at LDraw.org would have me (...) (14 years ago, 10-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.announce, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
|
(...) SNIP If I am right, this file would have error messages with L3P and DATHeader as the two lines are identical. So one line has to be deleted. cu mikeheide (14 years ago, 23-Aug-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
|
(...) If such things exist in BFC-certified parts, then they are obviously wrong, but won't necessarily be visible. It's obviously an error condition, so having the program detect it seems just to be a useful feature to me. I don't see why there (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
|
(...) Your guess is as good as mine. Hopefully Nils is reading and can answer it via me. Tim (14 years ago, 20-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
|
(...) Double sided part? I don't get it at all. Two identical references to a primitive, and the first is preceded by a BCF INVERTNEXT instruction. How will it look after being changed to single-sided? Has there been any discussions on this issue so (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
|
(...) Hi, I like to introduce version 1.7.0.5 Beta of the BFC-Tool (it is necessary to update the information on the downloads section on ldraw.org): New features: Changed required .NET Framework from 3.5 to Framework 2.0 Added "What's (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
