To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 4734
4733  |  4735
Subject: 
Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:27:58 GMT
Viewed: 
27410 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
+ triangles plays havoc with smooth shading (the helical artefact that can be
seen here http://www.holly-wood.it/tmp/LEGODraw/m50986.png disappears when
triangles are converted to quads. But I guess it could be solved at renderer
level too.

Note that I consider this behavior to be a bug in LDView, and as such I will fix
it when I get a chance.

--Travis



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
 
(...) Isn't this the same problem we ran into with the twisted wedge bricks a while back? Those gave us problematic conditional lines in addition to the ugly zigzag shading artifacts. (URL) thought the solution was to orient the triangles orthogonal (...) (14 years ago, 18-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch
 
(...) Good question! + reduces file size by 50% + 50% less vertices to adjust when building "by hand" + triangles plays havoc with smooth shading (the helical artefact that can be seen here (URL) disappears when triangles are converted to quads. But (...) (14 years ago, 17-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

21 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR