Subject:
|
Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 03:35:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
36603 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Timothy Gould wrote:
> For example:
>
> | 0 BFC INVERTNEXT
> | 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud2.dat
> | 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud2.dat
>
> is a double sided part. This part will be detected as "double-sided" and can
> be changed to single-sided by clicking on it.
Double sided part?
I don't get it at all. Two identical references to a primitive, and the first is
preceded by a BCF INVERTNEXT instruction. How will it look after being changed
to single-sided?
Has there been any discussions on this issue so I can get more familiar with the
problem? It's all new to me.
/Tore
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
| (...) If such things exist in BFC-certified parts, then they are obviously wrong, but won't necessarily be visible. It's obviously an error condition, so having the program detect it seems just to be a useful feature to me. I don't see why there (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw BFC Tool
|
| (...) Hi, I like to introduce version 1.7.0.5 Beta of the BFC-Tool (it is necessary to update the information on the downloads section on ldraw.org): New features: Changed required .NET Framework from 3.5 to Framework 2.0 Added "What's (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
